| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-15 | Chisago Lakes High | USHS-MN | 19 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 0.421 | 0.1134 | 0.1189 | 0.1023 | 0.1073 |
| 2016-17 | Minnesota Mullets | USPHL-Elite | 17 | 6 | 9 | 15 | 0.882 | 0.1550 | 0.1658 | 0.2022 | 0.2163 |
| 2017-18 | Minnesota Mullets | USPHL-Premier | 40 | 11 | 26 | 37 | 0.925 | 0.3049 | 0.3118 | 0.3147 | 0.3218 |
| 2018-19 | Texas Jr. Brahmas | NA3HL | 44 | 14 | 26 | 40 | 0.909 | 0.2091 | 0.2016 | 0.2880 | 0.2776 |
| 2019-20 | Texas Jr. Brahmas | NA3HL | 43 | 22 | 39 | 61 | 1.419 | 0.3263 | 0.3263 | 0.4494 | 0.4494 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-21 | Wisconsin-Stout | D1 | BigTen | FR | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.500 |
| 2020-21 | Wisconsin-Stout | D3 | BigTen | FR | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.500 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.