IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

David Moncur Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1984-03-06 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2001-02 Quesnel Millionaires BCHL 53 1 7 8 0.151 0.0581 0.0611 0.2196 0.2309
2002-03 — BCHL 51 7 13 20 0.392 0.1511 0.1523 0.5708 0.5755
2003-04 Nanaimo Clippers BCHL 57 9 35 44 0.772 0.2974 0.2866 1.1233 1.0826
2004-05 — BCHL 47 5 28 33 0.702 0.2705 0.2481 1.0218 0.9371
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2007-08 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen JR 2 0 0 0 0.000
2006-07 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC SO 11 2 7 9 0.818
2005-06 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC FR 25 1 8 9 0.360
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.25
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.36
2005-06 · Wisconsin-Superior
+44.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#4814
Defenseman overall
#654
Defenseman born in 1984
#1131
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ben Schmidling
St. Norbert · 2018-19
0.833 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Carlos Fornaris
New England College · 2015-16
1.115 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Eric Bolden
Elmira · 2016-17
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.