icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2001-02 | Quesnel Millionaires | BCHL | 53 | 1 | 7 | 8 | 0.151 | 0.0587 | 0.0617 | 0.2201 | 0.2314 |
| 2002-03 | — | BCHL | 51 | 7 | 13 | 20 | 0.392 | 0.1526 | 0.1539 | 0.5719 | 0.5766 |
| 2003-04 | Nanaimo Clippers | BCHL | 57 | 9 | 35 | 44 | 0.772 | 0.3004 | 0.2895 | 1.1257 | 1.0849 |
| 2004-05 | — | BCHL | 47 | 5 | 28 | 33 | 0.702 | 0.2733 | 0.2506 | 1.0239 | 0.9390 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007-08 | Wisconsin-River Falls | D3 | — | JR | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
| 2006-07 | Wisconsin-Superior | D3 | — | SO | 11 | 2 | 7 | 9 | 0.818 |
| 2005-06 | Wisconsin-Superior | D3 | — | FR | 25 | 1 | 8 | 9 | 0.360 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.