IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

T.J. Warkentin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1985-04-29 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 Dauphin Kings MJHL 5 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2001-02 Dauphin Kings MJHL 43 4 11 15 0.349 0.0671 0.0746 0.2198 0.2443
2002-03 Dauphin Kings MJHL 24 3 8 11 0.458 0.0882 0.0945 0.2888 0.3093
2003-04 Dauphin Kings MJHL 64 16 33 49 0.766 0.1474 0.1510 0.4825 0.4943
2004-05 Dauphin Kings MJHL 61 18 45 63 1.033 0.1988 0.1943 0.6509 0.6361
2005-06 Dauphin Kings MJHL 55 23 41 64 1.164 0.2240 0.2074 0.7333 0.6788
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2006-07 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 — FR 5 0 1 1 0.200
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.20
2006-07 · Wisconsin-River Falls
+15.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#17584
Forward overall
#545
Forward born in 1985
#125
in MJHL

D1 Comparables

Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Matthew Manning
Worcester State · 2016-17
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Marinac
SUNY Brockport · 2012-13
0.905 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Thomas Bishop
Suffolk · 2014-15
0.565 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.