IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Robertson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1993-04-14 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Nepean Raiders CCHL 23 2 3 5 0.217 0.0472 0.0431 0.1682 0.1534
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Lawrence D3 NCHA SR 21 0 1 1 0.048
2015-16 Lawrence D3 NCHA JR 20 1 3 4 0.200
2014-15 Lawrence D3 NCHA SO 11 0 3 3 0.273
2013-14 Lawrence D3 NCHA FR 11 0 2 2 0.182

NCAAe Rankings

#22339
Defenseman overall
#2040
Defenseman born in 1993
#1724
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Connor Mariner
Wisconsin-Stout · 2023-24
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrew Riddell
New England College · 2005-06
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Gordon Wells
St. Olaf · 2013-14
0.308 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.