IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sean Miller Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-12-17 Country: USA
Quinnipiac
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2025-26 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 46 3 6 9 0.196 0.1154 0.1249 0.5878 0.6363
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

52%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
12%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#42627
Forward overall
#795
Forward born in 2008
#3638
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Tyler Sheehy
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.81 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Alec Marsh
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Penn State (0.57 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Jared Fiegl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Cornell (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Joe Snively
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Yale (0.88 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Pavelek
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Michigan State
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG

Quinnipiac Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Michael Salandra
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.00
actual FR PPG at Quinnipiac
Anthony Cipollone
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.14
actual FR PPG at Quinnipiac
Timothy Heinke
NE-Prep 2020-21
0.20
actual FR PPG at Quinnipiac
Andon Cerbone
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.67
actual FR PPG at Quinnipiac

D2/3 Comparables

Marlon Gardner
Neumann · 2003-04
1.067 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Jake Suede
Adrian · 2017-18
0.643 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Richard Manley
SUNY Geneseo · 2006-07
1.150 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.