IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Patrick Sivets Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-10-28 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Mason City Toros NA3HL 47 18 21 39 0.830 0.0918 0.0907 0.2620 0.2588
2012-13 Mason City Toros NA3HL 43 34 23 57 1.326 0.1466 0.1375 0.4185 0.3926
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 St. Olaf D3 MIAC SR 24 6 7 13 0.542
2015-16 St. Olaf D3 MIAC JR 24 5 3 8 0.333
2014-15 St. Olaf D3 MIAC SO 19 1 1 2 0.105
2013-14 St. Olaf D3 MIAC FR 6 0 1 1 0.167
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.17
2013-14 · St. Olaf
+63.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#20384
Forward overall
#760
Forward born in 1992
#441
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Owen Guerin
UMass Dartmouth · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Brad Pizzey
Nazareth · 2014-15
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Alex Kromm
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2011-12
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.