IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Owen Guerin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-10-26 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 New England Wolves |EHLP / Elite| EHLP 11 3 3 6 0.545 0.0427 0.0461 0.1232 0.1330
2022-23 New England Wolves |EHLP / Elite| EHLP 16 4 8 12 0.750 0.0587 0.0603 0.1694 0.1740
2023-24 New Hampshire Avalanche EHL 25 6 7 13 0.520 0.1116 0.1156 0.2546 0.2636
2024-25 New Hampshire Avalanche EHL 43 19 23 42 0.977 0.2096 0.2063 0.4783 0.4707
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 UMass Dartmouth D3 — FR 6 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

52%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#28709
Forward overall
#1485
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Doucet
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Nick DeCenzo
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Army (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Andrew Klin
Buffalo State · 2008-09
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Dave Lewandowski
Wentworth · 2004-05
0.857 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Grant Newcomer
Concordia Wisconsin · 2021-22
0.423 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.