IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Broden McArthur Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2009-02-24 Country: USA
Minnesota
BigTen D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2025-26 U.S. National U17 Team NTDP-U18 55 3 10 13 0.236 0.1757 0.1780 0.8865 0.8981
2026-27 Erie Otters OHL 6 0 3 3 0.500 0.2893 0.2893 1.3092 1.3092
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
70%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9695
Defenseman overall
#190
Defenseman born in 2009

D1 Comparables

Clark Kuster
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ St. Cloud State
0.29 No data
NCAAe PPG
Luke Voltin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Jack Stander
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Canisius (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Will Butcher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Denver (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Roy
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average D
NCAAe PPG

Minnesota Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Ryan Lindgren
NTDP-U18 2015-16
0.22
actual FR PPG at Minnesota
Ryan Chesley
NTDP-U18 2021-22
0.28
actual FR PPG at Minnesota
Max Rud
USHS-MN 2020-21
0.00
actual FR PPG at Minnesota
Tarin Smith
WHL 2023-24
0.00
actual FR PPG at Minnesota

D2/3 Comparables

Bryce Grandbois
Worcester State · 2022-23
0.769 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jason Yuel
Curry · 2004-05
1.769 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Nate Pionk
St. Scholastica · 2014-15
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.