IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Broden McArthur Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2009-02-24 Country: USA
Minnesota
BigTen D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2025-26 U.S. National U17 Team NTDP-U18 55 3 10 13 0.236 0.1757 0.1780 0.8821 0.8937
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

78%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Age-Out / Club
15%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9550
Defenseman overall
#156
Defenseman born in 2009

D1 Comparables

Dan Willett
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ RIT (0.46 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Josh Jacobs
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Jake Linhart
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Collins
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Louie Belpedio
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Miami (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

Minnesota Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Sam Rinzel
USHS-MN 2021-22
0.72
actual FR PPG at Minnesota
Luke Mittelstadt
USHS-MN 2020-21
0.55
actual FR PPG at Minnesota
Finn McLaughlin
AJHL 2022-23
0.03
actual FR PPG at Minnesota
Cal Thomas
USHS-MN 2020-21
0.15
actual FR PPG at Minnesota

D2/3 Comparables

Mickey Gilchrist
Middlebury · 2001-02
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Jax Murray
Trinity · 2015-16
0.875 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Dylan Nowakowski
St. Scholastica · 2008-09
0.889 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.