← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kurt Gottschalk Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1992-06-09 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Haliburton County Huskies OJHL 5 0 1 1 0.200 0.0601 0.0668 0.1369 0.1522
2009-10 Ajax Attack OJHL 9 0 0 0 0.000
2010-11 OJHL 45 0 2 2 0.044 0.0133 0.0135 0.0304 0.0308
2011-12 OJHL 39 0 3 3 0.077 0.0231 0.0224 0.0526 0.0509
2012-13 OJHL 31 0 3 3 0.097 0.0291 0.0267 0.0663 0.0609
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 Fredonia D3 FR 11 0 1 1 0.091
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.02
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.09
2013-14 · Fredonia
+285.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#30575
Defenseman overall
#2465
Defenseman born in 1992
#6095
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Southern Maine · 2017-18
0.095 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
UMass Boston · 2022-23
0.188 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Amherst · 2015-16
0.167 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.