← New Search ↗ Social Card

Derek Tillotson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-06-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 New Hampshire Jr. Monarchs EHL 40 16 20 36 0.900 0.2079 0.2098 0.4404 0.4444
2017-18 New Hampshire Avalanche EHL 19 6 12 18 0.947 0.2188 0.2086 0.4636 0.4421
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Southern Maine D3 NEHC SR 16 1 6 7 0.438
2020-21 Southern Maine D1 HockeyEast JR 4 0 1 1 0.250
2020-21 Southern Maine D3 HockeyEast JR 4 0 1 1 0.250
2019-20 Southern Maine D1 HockeyEast SO 26 5 5 10 0.385
2019-20 Southern Maine D3 HockeyEast SO 26 5 5 10 0.385
2018-19 Southern Maine D1 HockeyEast FR 21 1 1 2 0.095
2018-19 Southern Maine D3 HockeyEast FR 21 1 1 2 0.095
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.10
2018-19 · Southern Maine
-46.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18794
Forward overall
#837
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wesleyan · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Roger Williams · 2024-25
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Fredonia · 2023-24
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.