IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ethan Piercy Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2007-10-27 Country: USA
Lindenwood
Ind. D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2025-26 Cedar Rapids RoughRiders USHL 45 1 7 8 0.178 0.1049 0.1076 0.5335 0.5471
2026-27 Cedar Rapids RoughRiders USHL 7 0 1 1 0.143 0.0843 0.0843 0.4288 0.4288
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
25%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15899
Defenseman overall
#2077
Defenseman born in 2007
#3986
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Mike Preston
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.07 PPG
→ Army (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Joe Schuldt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Michigan Tech
0.05 No data
NCAAe PPG
Neal Goff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Cliff Watson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Eric Schurhamer
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Maine (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

Lindenwood Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Kim Elfving
SuperElit 2025-26
0.00
actual FR PPG at Lindenwood
Jack Anderson
USHS-MN 2021-22
0.33
actual FR PPG at Lindenwood
Noah Houle
CCHL 2022-23
0.50
actual FR PPG at Lindenwood
Joe Prouty
NAHL 2020-21
0.37
actual FR PPG at Lindenwood

D2/3 Comparables

Andrew Klin
Buffalo State · 2007-08
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Shael Hechter
Gustavus Adolphus · 2008-09
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Bret Adams
Curry · 2001-02
1.759 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.