IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ethan Piercy Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2007-10-27 Country: USA
Lindenwood
Ind. D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2025-26 Cedar Rapids RoughRiders USHL 45 1 7 8 0.178 0.1049 0.1076 0.5340 0.5476
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
25%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15683
Defenseman overall
#2016
Defenseman born in 2007
#3740
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Kyle Mackey
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Air Force (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Ruslan Pedan
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Lukas Buchta
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.05 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.03 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Gustav Olofsson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Garrett Cecere
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.09 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

Lindenwood Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Jack Anderson
USHS-MN 2021-22
0.33
actual FR PPG at Lindenwood
Noah Houle
CCHL 2021-22
0.50
actual FR PPG at Lindenwood
Joe Prouty
NAHL 2019-20
0.37
actual FR PPG at Lindenwood
Jacob Delaney
NAHL 2022-23
0.29
actual FR PPG at Lindenwood

D2/3 Comparables

Marco Taffo
Misericordia · 2021-22
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Jonathan Grebosky
Concordia · 2011-12
0.769 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Kevin Leonard
Western New England · 2000-01
0.588 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.