IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Maddox Malmquist Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-07-07 Country: Canada
Bemidji State
CCHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2025-26 Tri-City Storm USHL 49 4 3 7 0.143 0.0843 0.0894 0.4292 0.4551
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
12%
Age-Out / Club
57%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#49524
Forward overall
#1005
Forward born in 2008
#3920
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Max Humitz
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.07 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Jake Ahlgren
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Bentley (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Average
NCAAe PPG
Dawson Cook
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Zach Evancho
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Army (0.62 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Matt Mendelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Penn State (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Bemidji State Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Tory Lund
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.38
actual FR PPG at Bemidji State
Lleyton Roed
USHS-MN 2020-21
0.86
actual FR PPG at Bemidji State
Jaksen Panzer
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.19
actual FR PPG at Bemidji State
Brendan Harris
NAHL 2013-14
0.33
actual FR PPG at Bemidji State

D2/3 Comparables

Garrett Hallford
Trine · 2014-15
0.960 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Emmond Bell
Norwich · 2004-05
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Braydon Beahm
St. Norbert · 2021-22
0.968 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.