IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nathaniel Poole Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2007-03-26 Country: USA
Union
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2025-26 Lincoln Stars USHL 48 1 5 6 0.125 0.0737 0.0734 0.3754 0.3739
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
38%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#21014
Defenseman overall
#2551
Defenseman born in 2007
#4007
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Phil Boje
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.10 PPG
→ Air Force (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Zach Frye
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Justin Wade
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.10 No data
NCAAe PPG
Dane Cooper
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Brown (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Maller
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG

Union Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Nick Young
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.26
actual FR PPG at Union
Étienne Lessard
CCHL 2022-23
0.65
actual FR PPG at Union
Joe Young
NE-Prep 2023-24
0.00
actual FR PPG at Union
Noah Henry
BCHL 2012-13
0.03
actual FR PPG at Union

D2/3 Comparables

Denys Arkhypenko
King's · 2018-19
0.458 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jack DesRuisseaux
Wesleyan · 2021-22
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Davis Kinne
Salem State · 2021-22
0.692 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.