IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nathaniel Poole Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2007-03-26 Country: USA
Union
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2025-26 Lincoln Stars USHL 48 1 5 6 0.125 0.0737 0.0734 0.3751 0.3736
2026-27 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 6 0 2 2 0.333 0.1966 0.1966 1.0001 1.0001
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

72%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
10%
Age-Out / Club
15%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#21270
Defenseman overall
#2605
Defenseman born in 2007
#4250
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Victor Björkung
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Vinny Muto
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Niagara (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Max Everson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Harvard (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Johnny Hrabovsky
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Jared Kolquist
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

Union Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Étienne Lessard
BCHL 2023-24
0.65
actual FR PPG at Union
Cullen Ferguson
NAHL 2020-21
0.27
actual FR PPG at Union
D.J. Hart
USHL 2021-22
0.24
actual FR PPG at Union
Cooper Sharp
BCHL 2024-25
0.00
actual FR PPG at Union

D2/3 Comparables

Jacob Kaminski
UMass Boston · 2021-22
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
John McLean
Salve Regina · 2015-16
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Brent Wold
Utica · 2012-13
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.