← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cooper Sharp Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-05-04 Country: Canada
Union
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Camrose Kodiaks AJHL 3 0 1 1 0.333 0.1118 0.1254 0.3084 0.3459
2022-23 Camrose Kodiaks AJHL 55 3 18 21 0.382 0.1281 0.1373 0.3533 0.3787
2023-24 AJHL 40 2 10 12 0.300 0.1006 0.1031 0.2776 0.2845
2024-25 Sherwood Park Crusaders BCHL 54 10 15 25 0.463 0.1784 0.1742 0.6738 0.6580
2025-26 Sherwood Park Crusaders BCHL 54 8 20 28 0.518 0.1998 0.1878 0.7546 0.7092
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
22%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8685
Defenseman overall
#1948
Defenseman born in 2005

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

Union Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

BCHL 2014-15
0.00
actual FR PPG at Union
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.26
actual FR PPG at Union
NAHL 2024-25
0.09
actual FR PPG at Union
USHL 2012-13
0.11
actual FR PPG at Union

D2/3 Comparables

St. Olaf · 2024-25
0.708 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint Anselm · 2017-18
0.655 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2013-14
0.893 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.