← New Search ↗ Social Card

John McLean Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-03-23 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Islanders Hockey Club USPHL-Premier-Classic 36 1 6 7 0.194 0.0546 0.0545 0.1601 0.1599
2016-17 Islanders Hockey Club USPHL-Premier-Classic 44 7 23 30 0.682 0.1914 0.1819 0.5615 0.5336
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Salve Regina D3 CNE GR 20 8 10 18 0.900
2020-21 Salve Regina D3 CNE SR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Salve Regina D1 JR 19 6 10 16 0.842
2019-20 Salve Regina D3 CNE JR 19 6 10 16 0.842
2018-19 Salve Regina D1 SO 27 10 12 22 0.815
2018-19 Salve Regina D3 CNE SO 27 10 12 22 0.815
2017-18 Salve Regina D3 CNE FR 26 7 6 13 0.500
2014-15 Gustavus Adolphus D3 0 131 1587 1718 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#12307
Defenseman overall
#1736
Defenseman born in 1996
#168
in USPHL-Premier-Classic

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Saint Mary's (MN) · 2013-14
0.630 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Westfield State · 2009-10
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Fredonia · 2016-17
0.545 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.