IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Joe Verboys Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-03-19 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Connecticut Jr. Rangers USPHL-Premier-Classic 14 0 1 1 0.071 0.0200 0.0200 0.0587 0.0587
2017-18 New York Apple Core EHL 24 13 19 32 1.333 0.3080 0.2905 0.6524 0.6154
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Neumann D3 MAC — 7 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Neumann D1 MAC JR 9 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Neumann D3 MAC — 9 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Neumann D1 MAC SO 7 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Neumann D3 MAC — 7 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Gustavus Adolphus D1 MIAC FR 3 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC — 3 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17838
Forward overall
#787
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Gramm McCormack
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2021-22
1.111 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Liam Board
Neumann · 2013-14
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Mack Heisinger
Curry · 2014-15
0.760 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.