IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Christopher Zuccaro Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-05-16 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Northern Cyclones EHL 29 10 25 35 1.207 0.2788 0.2768 0.5905 0.5862
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast SR 26 9 16 25 0.962
2016-17 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast JR 25 9 14 23 0.920
2015-16 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast SO 9 4 4 8 0.889
2014-15 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast FR 21 3 11 14 0.667
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.24
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.67
2014-15 · Plymouth State
+181.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#8300
Forward overall
#381
Forward born in 1994
#66
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Luc Gerdes
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tanner Pond
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brett Skibba
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ UConn (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tommy Schutt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Alfred Larsson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Matthew Orlando
Anna Maria · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Paul Conter
Southern Maine · 2005-06
0.864 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jack Guvenal
Concordia · 2022-23
0.704 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.