icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 | Brockville Braves | CCHL | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2011-12 | — | CCHL | 53 | 7 | 13 | 20 | 0.377 | 0.1077 | 0.1101 | 0.2921 | 0.2987 |
| 2012-13 | — | CCHL | 45 | 3 | 8 | 11 | 0.244 | 0.0698 | 0.0683 | 0.1892 | 0.1851 |
| 2013-14 | Smiths Falls Bears | CCHL | 57 | 7 | 28 | 35 | 0.614 | 0.1752 | 0.1627 | 0.4753 | 0.4414 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015-16 | Canton | D3 | — | SO | 21 | 0 | 8 | 8 | 0.381 |
| 2014-15 | Canton | D3 | — | FR | 23 | 4 | 9 | 13 | 0.565 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.