← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jordan McIntyre Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1985-10-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2004-05 Portage Terriers MJHL 62 30 25 55 0.887 0.1708 0.1707 0.5594 0.5590
2005-06 Portage Terriers MJHL 46 14 24 38 0.826 0.1590 0.1507 0.5209 0.4937
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2009-10 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen SR 28 2 9 11 0.393
2008-09 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen JR 27 3 8 11 0.407
2007-08 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen SO 14 1 1 2 0.143
2006-07 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen FR 28 4 8 12 0.429
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.43
2006-07 · Wisconsin-River Falls
+215.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#23796
Forward overall
#756
Forward born in 1985
#261
in MJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Geneseo · 2014-15
0.652 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Bethel · 2017-18
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Geneseo · 2024-25
0.518 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.