IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jordan McIntyre Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1985-10-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2004-05 Portage Terriers MJHL 62 30 25 55 0.887 0.2510 0.2508 0.5590 0.5586
2005-06 Portage Terriers MJHL 46 14 24 38 0.826 0.2337 0.2215 0.5205 0.4933
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2009-10 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 — SR 28 2 9 11 0.393
2008-09 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 — JR 27 3 8 11 0.407
2007-08 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 — SO 14 1 1 2 0.143
2006-07 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 — FR 28 4 8 12 0.429
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.43
2006-07 · Wisconsin-River Falls
+114.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#15557
Forward overall
#568
Forward born in 1985
#307
in MJHL

D1 Comparables

Ryan Doucet
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jayson Angus
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Arthur Gordon
SUNY Geneseo · 2014-15
0.652 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Josiah Roen
Bethel · 2017-18
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Horan
Williams · 2021-22
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.