IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Matt Stengl Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1985-12-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2004-05 Selkirk Steelers MJHL 36 16 15 31 0.861 0.2436 0.2452 0.5426 0.5463
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2008-09 St. Scholastica D3 — SR 19 4 8 12 0.632
2007-08 St. Scholastica D3 — JR 21 5 8 13 0.619
2006-07 St. Scholastica D3 — SO 22 8 2 10 0.455
2005-06 St. Scholastica D3 — FR 23 9 10 19 0.826
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.83
2005-06 · St. Scholastica
+293.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#15260
Forward overall
#559
Forward born in 1985
#297
in MJHL

D1 Comparables

Kenny Gillespie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ RPI (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Gareau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Austin Vieth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brett D'Andrea
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Hynes
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Union (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nolan Zotter
Canton · 2021-22
0.545 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Amedeo Mastrangeli
Elmira · 2018-19
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Neil Musselwhite
SUNY Oswego · 2004-05
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.