IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Matt Meredith Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-08-13 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 New Jersey Jr. Titans EHL 23 1 2 3 0.130 0.0191 0.0182 0.0639 0.0610
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 SUNY Brockport D3 — SR 21 0 1 1 0.048
2016-17 SUNY Brockport D3 — JR 20 0 1 1 0.050
2015-16 SUNY Brockport D3 — SO 10 1 0 1 0.100
2014-15 SUNY Brockport D3 — FR 14 0 5 5 0.357
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.02
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.36
2014-15 · SUNY Brockport
+2189.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#58249
Forward overall
#2257
Forward born in 1993
#3029
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ben Thompson
SUNY Potsdam · 2017-18
0.083 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Dante Suffredini
UMass Boston · 2015-16
0.208 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Tommy Robaczewski
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2010-11
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.