← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dante Suffredini Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1995-08-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Soo Eagles NAHL 39 3 5 8 0.205 0.0729 0.0802 0.2153 0.2368
2013-14 Soo Eagles NAHL 56 1 6 7 0.125 0.0444 0.0466 0.1312 0.1377
2014-15 Brockville Braves CCHL 22 3 6 9 0.409 0.0887 0.0871 0.3167 0.3110
2015-16 Johnstown Tomahawks NAHL 58 5 12 17 0.293 0.1041 0.0992 0.3077 0.2932
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Trine D1 JR 11 1 2 3 0.273
2018-19 Trine D3 NCHA 11 1 2 3 0.273
2017-18 Trine D3 9 1 4 5 0.556
2017-18 UMass Boston D3 NEHC SO 4 0 1 1 0.250
2016-17 UMass Boston D3 MASCAC FR 24 0 5 5 0.208
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.21
2016-17 · UMass Boston
+133.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#13778
Defenseman overall
#1780
Defenseman born in 1995
#4516
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

UMass Dartmouth · 2021-22
0.368 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Rivier · 2024-25
0.417 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2010-11
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.