← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jimmy Mettler Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-08-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 New York Apple Core EHL 2 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 New York Apple Core EHL 44 4 16 20 0.455 0.0665 0.0665 0.2228 0.2228
2020-21 New York Apple Core EHL 29 3 16 19 0.655 0.0959 0.0959 0.3212 0.3212
2021-22 EHL 44 4 31 35 0.795 0.1164 0.1139 0.3900 0.3818
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Western New England D3 CNE SR 24 0 9 9 0.375
2024-25 Western New England D3 CNE 25 0 8 8 0.320
2023-24 Western New England D3 CNE 24 0 7 7 0.292
2022-23 UMass Dartmouth D3 FR 19 1 6 7 0.368
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.37
2022-23 · UMass Dartmouth
+242.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4843
Defenseman overall
#1129
Defenseman born in 2001
#570
in EHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Concordia · 2021-22
0.348 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2016-17
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2008-09
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.