| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-19 | New York Apple Core | EHL | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2019-20 | New York Apple Core | EHL | 44 | 4 | 16 | 20 | 0.455 | 0.0665 | 0.0665 | 0.2228 | 0.2228 |
| 2020-21 | New York Apple Core | EHL | 29 | 3 | 16 | 19 | 0.655 | 0.0959 | 0.0959 | 0.3212 | 0.3212 |
| 2021-22 | — | EHL | 44 | 4 | 31 | 35 | 0.795 | 0.1164 | 0.1139 | 0.3900 | 0.3818 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Western New England | D3 | CNE | SR | 24 | 0 | 9 | 9 | 0.375 |
| 2024-25 | Western New England | D3 | CNE | — | 25 | 0 | 8 | 8 | 0.320 |
| 2023-24 | Western New England | D3 | CNE | — | 24 | 0 | 7 | 7 | 0.292 |
| 2022-23 | UMass Dartmouth | D3 | — | FR | 19 | 1 | 6 | 7 | 0.368 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.