← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mason Ausmus Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-08-26 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Philadelphia Rebels NAHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 West Bend Power NA3HL 36 6 13 19 0.528 0.0636 0.0636 0.1667 0.1667
2021-22 West Bend Power NA3HL 42 13 33 46 1.095 0.1320 0.1244 0.3460 0.3260
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Concordia D3 MIAC SR 17 1 2 3 0.176
2025-26 Concordia Wisconsin D3 NCHA SR 17 1 2 3 0.176
2024-25 Concordia D3 MIAC JR 26 0 3 3 0.115
2024-25 Concordia Wisconsin D3 NCHA JR 26 0 3 3 0.115
2023-24 Concordia D3 MIAC SO 23 2 1 3 0.130
2023-24 Concordia Wisconsin D3 NCHA SO 23 2 1 3 0.130
2022-23 Concordia D3 MIAC FR 23 3 5 8 0.348
2022-23 Concordia Wisconsin D3 NCHA FR 22 3 5 8 0.364
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.35
2022-23 · Concordia
+196.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

52%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11788
Defenseman overall
#1630
Defenseman born in 2001

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UConn (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Norbert · 2009-10
0.429 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Olaf · 2007-08
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
New England College · 2004-05
0.792 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.