IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Joe Perry Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1989-08-29 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Alberni Valley Bulldogs BCHL 5 0 1 1 0.200 0.0771 0.0838 0.2911 0.3165
2007-08 Nanaimo Clippers BCHL 41 7 5 12 0.293 0.1128 0.1166 0.4260 0.4403
2008-09 Nanaimo Clippers BCHL 56 12 18 30 0.536 0.2064 0.2047 0.7796 0.7730
2009-10 Nanaimo Clippers BCHL 37 8 20 28 0.757 0.2916 0.2732 1.1014 1.0320
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SR 32 24 13 37 1.156
2012-13 St. Norbert D3 NCHA JR 29 11 20 31 1.069
2011-12 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SO 26 10 16 26 1.000
2010-11 St. Norbert D3 NCHA FR 28 5 7 12 0.429
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.43
2010-11 · St. Norbert
+103.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#25965
Forward overall
#875
Forward born in 1989
#1379
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Josh Cousineau
Adrian · 2009-10
0.773 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Dylan Hutton
Concordia · 2012-13
0.867 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Keenan Hodgson
Amherst · 2013-14
1.111 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.