← New Search ↗ Social Card

Joe Perry Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1989-08-29 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Alberni Valley Bulldogs BCHL 5 0 1 1 0.200 0.0778 0.0846 0.2917 0.3172
2007-08 Nanaimo Clippers BCHL 41 7 5 12 0.293 0.1139 0.1177 0.4268 0.4411
2008-09 Nanaimo Clippers BCHL 56 12 18 30 0.536 0.2085 0.2067 0.7812 0.7746
2009-10 Nanaimo Clippers BCHL 37 8 20 28 0.757 0.2945 0.2759 1.1036 1.0340
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SR 32 24 13 37 1.156
2012-13 St. Norbert D3 NCHA JR 29 11 20 31 1.069
2011-12 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SO 26 10 16 26 1.000
2010-11 St. Norbert D3 NCHA FR 28 5 7 12 0.429
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.43
2010-11 · St. Norbert
+101.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#17091
Forward overall
#670
Forward born in 1989
#1490
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Sacred Heart (0.40 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

New England · 2017-18
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2009-10
0.773 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Geneseo · 2009-10
1.150 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.