IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Evan Byrnes Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1993-05-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 New Jersey Rockets EHL 44 0 8 8 0.182 0.0266 0.0251 0.0890 0.0839
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Fitchburg State D3 MASCAC SR 28 3 6 9 0.321
2016-17 Fitchburg State D3 MASCAC JR 27 2 2 4 0.148
2015-16 Fitchburg State D3 MASCAC SO 24 0 2 2 0.083
2014-15 Fitchburg State D3 MASCAC FR 25 1 3 4 0.160
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.02
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.16
2014-15 · Fitchburg State
+575.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#23374
Defenseman overall
#2106
Defenseman born in 1993
#2714
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nicholas Taurence
St. Scholastica · 2009-10
0.125 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Connor Pelkey
Skidmore · 2013-14
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Danny Caputo
Southern Maine · 2023-24
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.