IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Landon Cottingham Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2007-04-03 Country: USA
Alaska Fairbanks
Ind. D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Hill-Murray USHS-MN 31 8 13 21 0.677 0.0858 0.0858 0.1645 0.1645
2023-24 Hill-Murray USHS-MN 28 10 20 30 1.071 0.1356 0.1356 0.2602 0.2602
2024-25 — NAHL 22 2 2 4 0.182 0.0668 0.0728 0.1919 0.2091
2025-26 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 6 0 1 1 0.167 0.0983 0.0980 0.5007 0.4993
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
35%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#12601
Defenseman overall
#1669
Defenseman born in 2007

D1 Comparables

Justin Wade
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.10 No data
NCAAe PPG
Dane Cooper
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Brown (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Zach Frye
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Chris Buchanan
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Bentley (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Tim Davison
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG

Alaska Fairbanks Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Jackson Anderson
USHS-MN 2020-21
0.25
actual FR PPG at Alaska Fairbanks
Nathan Rickey
USHS-MN 2021-22
0.17
actual FR PPG at Alaska Fairbanks
Carson Reed
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.06
actual FR PPG at Alaska Fairbanks
Zach Frye
USHL 2012-13
0.28
actual FR PPG at Alaska Fairbanks

D2/3 Comparables

Jack Seaverson
St. Norbert · 2021-22
0.452 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ethan Hull
Bethel · 2019-20
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ethan Hersant
St. Olaf · 2018-19
0.593 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.