IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Adam Moody Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-03-24 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Aurora Tigers OJHL 56 3 5 8 0.143 0.0350 0.0384 0.0984 0.1081
2010-11 Aurora Tigers OJHL 49 5 10 15 0.306 0.0750 0.0789 0.2107 0.2216
2011-12 Aurora Tigers OJHL 46 6 26 32 0.696 0.1705 0.1718 0.4789 0.4826
2012-13 Aurora Tigers OJHL 48 11 21 32 0.667 0.1634 0.1565 0.4589 0.4396
2013-14 Cowichan Valley Capitals BCHL 32 5 6 11 0.344 0.1325 0.1219 0.5000 0.4600
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Utica D3 UCHC — 20 4 5 9 0.450
2014-15 Utica D3 UCHC — 1 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#33955
Forward overall
#1169
Forward born in 1993

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Micaiah Bascombe
Roger Williams · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Auggie Moore
Saint John's · 2018-19
1.080 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Riley Ott
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2021-22
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.