IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Lloyd Hayes Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-08-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 New Hampshire Jr. Monarchs EHL 22 4 6 10 0.455 0.0665 0.0702 0.2226 0.2350
2014-15 Islanders Hockey Club USPHL-Premier-Classic 42 3 2 5 0.119 0.0334 0.0340 0.0979 0.0997
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Endicott D1 CNE SR 17 2 2 4 0.235
2018-19 Endicott D3 CNE SR 17 2 2 4 0.235
2017-18 Endicott D3 CNE JR 15 3 1 4 0.267
2016-17 Endicott D3 CNE SO 29 3 6 9 0.310
2015-16 Endicott D3 CNE FR 26 5 5 10 0.385
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.04
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.38
2015-16 · Endicott
+826.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#50044
Forward overall
#2191
Forward born in 1995

D1 Comparables

Conor Andrle
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Army (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average
NCAAe PPG
Josh Erickson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Greiner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Hynes
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Union (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jake Ellingson
Concordia · 2014-15
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Alec Holen
Concordia · 2005-06
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jordan Williamson
Curry · 2014-15
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.