← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jake Ellingson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-08-24 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Weyburn Red Wings SJHL 6 1 0 1 0.167 0.0427 0.0427 0.1254 0.1253
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Concordia D3 MIAC SR 26 6 2 8 0.308
2019-20 Concordia (MN) D1 SR 26 6 2 8 0.308
2018-19 Concordia D3 MIAC JR 26 3 3 6 0.231
2018-19 Concordia (MN) D1 JR 26 3 3 6 0.231
2017-18 Concordia D3 MIAC SO 25 4 4 8 0.320
2016-17 Concordia D3 MIAC FR 17 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Army (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Penn State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Lawrence · 2015-16
0.105 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia · 2013-14
0.263 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Hamilton · 2013-14
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.