IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jake Stilwell Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-08-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Winnipeg Blues MJHL 52 10 15 25 0.481 0.0926 0.0923 0.3030 0.3020
2014-15 Winnipeg Blues MJHL 51 10 9 19 0.372 0.0717 0.0678 0.2347 0.2218
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Concordia D3 MIAC SR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2017-18 Concordia D3 MIAC JR 17 3 2 5 0.294
2016-17 Concordia D3 MIAC SO 16 0 3 3 0.188
2015-16 Concordia D3 MIAC FR 19 5 0 5 0.263
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.26
2015-16 · Concordia
+296.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#43978
Forward overall
#1780
Forward born in 1994
#1122
in MJHL

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Curtis Judd
Southern Maine · 2018-19
0.375 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Kadin Ilott
Southern Maine · 2021-22
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jordan Tredinnick
Wisconsin-Stout · 2010-11
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.