← New Search ↗ Social Card

Curtis Judd Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-08-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 South Shore Kings USPHL-Premier 44 7 19 26 0.591 0.0773 0.0730 0.2006 0.1894
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Southern Maine D3 NEHC SR 14 6 10 16 1.143
2022-23 Southern Maine D3 NEHC SR 25 15 10 25 1.000
2021-22 Southern Maine D3 NEHC JR 22 4 10 14 0.636
2020-21 Southern Maine D1 HockeyEast SO 4 1 2 3 0.750
2020-21 Southern Maine D3 HockeyEast SO 4 1 2 3 0.750
2019-20 Southern Maine D1 HockeyEast FR 16 2 4 6 0.375
2019-20 Southern Maine D3 HockeyEast FR 16 2 4 6 0.375
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.38
2019-20 · Southern Maine
+500.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#29216
Forward overall
#1435
Forward born in 1998
#2278
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Finlandia · 2017-18
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Lawrence · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Rivier · 2021-22
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.