IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alfred Rotiroti Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-09-03 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 — USPHL-Premier 31 12 9 21 0.677 0.0889 0.0889 0.2300 0.2300
2021-22 Soo Thunderbirds NOJHL 18 9 3 12 0.667 0.1135 0.1054 0.2825 0.2624
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Rivier D3 MASCAC SR 24 2 2 4 0.167
2024-25 Rivier D3 MASCAC JR 24 2 4 6 0.250
2023-24 Rivier D3 MASCAC SO 24 7 6 13 0.542
2022-23 Rivier D3 MASCAC FR 21 4 2 6 0.286
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.29
2022-23 · Rivier
+216.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
25%
NCAA D2/D3
50%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#30951
Forward overall
#1656
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jake Lindstrom
UMass Boston · 2024-25
0.316 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Frédérick Allaire
Hamilton · 2018-19
0.385 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Matthew Headland
Canton · 2018-19
0.682 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.