IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kyle Watson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1986-08-23 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2003-04 Kanata Stallions CCHL 7 0 1 1 0.143 0.0310 0.0330 0.1106 0.1178
2004-05 Kanata Stallions CCHL 56 7 4 11 0.196 0.0426 0.0435 0.1520 0.1552
2005-06 Kanata Stallions CCHL 28 6 4 10 0.357 0.0775 0.0757 0.2763 0.2699
2006-07 Kanata Stallions CCHL 55 11 11 22 0.400 0.0868 0.0805 0.3095 0.2871
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2010-11 Adrian D3 NCHA — 29 5 11 16 0.552
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.55
2010-11 · Adrian
+719.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#45032
Forward overall
#1466
Forward born in 1986
#1298
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ryan Waltman
Skidmore · 2021-22
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Donovan Powell
Buffalo State · 2023-24
0.720 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Darren Banks
Finlandia · 2014-15
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.