IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Daniel Toycen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-08-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Coulee Region Chill NA3HL 41 10 18 28 0.683 0.0857 0.0893 0.2156 0.2246
2015-16 Coulee Region Chill NA3HL 40 21 27 48 1.200 0.1506 0.1496 0.3788 0.3762
2016-17 Coulee Region Chill NA3HL 47 14 27 41 0.872 0.1095 0.1032 0.2754 0.2596
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Lawrence D3 NCHA SR 8 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Lawrence D3 NCHA JR 24 1 3 4 0.167
2018-19 Lawrence D3 NCHA SO 25 3 3 6 0.240
2017-18 Lawrence D3 NCHA FR 19 0 2 2 0.105
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.11
2017-18 · Lawrence
1.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#26215
Forward overall
#1078
Forward born in 1996
#774
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Matthew Stanton
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2018-19
0.350 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Frédérick Allaire
Hamilton · 2018-19
0.385 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Luke Bennett
SUNY Brockport · 2015-16
0.217 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.