IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Matthew Stanton Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-08-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Stillwater High USHS-MN 23 5 11 16 0.696 0.0881 0.0901 0.1690 0.1729
2017-18 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 6 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2018-19 Minnesota Magicians NAHL 55 17 24 41 0.746 0.2739 0.2618 0.7869 0.7523
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 BigTen SO 7 1 2 3 0.429
2019-20 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 BigTen FR 20 5 2 7 0.350
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.35
2019-20 · Wisconsin-Eau Claire
+102.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

60%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#24128
Forward overall
#1170
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Andréas Fleutot
Westfield State · 2022-23
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan McKenna
Connecticut College · 2024-25
0.792 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Cayden Cahill
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2016-17
0.862 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.