IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Joseph Slovak Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-05-06 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Bay State Breakers USPHL-Premier-Classic 33 4 8 12 0.364 0.1021 0.1025 0.2995 0.3007
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Endicott D1 — SR 27 8 6 14 0.518
2018-19 Endicott D3 CNE SR 27 8 6 14 0.518
2017-18 Endicott D3 CNE JR 9 4 3 7 0.778
2016-17 Endicott D3 CNE SO 28 9 3 12 0.429
2015-16 Endicott D3 CNE FR 27 4 6 10 0.370
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.37
2015-16 · Endicott
+322.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#46134
Forward overall
#1989
Forward born in 1995
#220
in USPHL-Premier-Classic

D1 Comparables

William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Greiner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Sam Blanton
Bowdoin · 2023-24
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Aaron O'Neill
Lake Forest · 2016-17
0.630 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jayson Saraceno
New England College · 2007-08
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.