IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sebastian Foster Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-01-28 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Connecticut RoughRiders EHL 44 16 25 41 0.932 0.2152 0.2219 0.4559 0.4700
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Bowdoin D1 NESCAC SR 7 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Bowdoin D3 NESCAC SR 7 0 0 0 0.000
2017-18 Bowdoin D3 NESCAC JR 10 2 0 2 0.200
2016-17 Bowdoin D3 NESCAC SO 15 1 2 3 0.200
2015-16 Bowdoin D3 NESCAC FR 24 3 7 10 0.417
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.42
2015-16 · Bowdoin
+119.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#13951
Forward overall
#558
Forward born in 1996
#199
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Blake Winiecki
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jeff Kubiak
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Cornell (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Mason Jobst
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.86 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Seth Adams
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Mackenzie MacEachern
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.42 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Eddie Paulissian
Aurora · 2022-23
0.577 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Spencer DeRidder
Salem State · 2017-18
0.522 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Corey Kennedy
Neumann · 2013-14
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.