IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Michael Moran Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-04-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Boston Jr. Bruins USPHL-Elite 40 13 18 31 0.775 0.0577 0.0566 0.1776 0.1741
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Worcester State D3 MASCAC SR 17 12 13 25 1.471
2017-18 Worcester State D3 MASCAC JR 26 16 16 32 1.231
2016-17 Worcester State D3 MASCAC SO 17 6 7 13 0.765
2015-16 Worcester State D3 MASCAC FR 23 4 3 7 0.304
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.05
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.30
2015-16 · Worcester State
+528.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#39183
Forward overall
#1641
Forward born in 1995
#296
in USPHL-Elite

D1 Comparables

William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Greiner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Sam Williams
St. Scholastica · 2012-13
0.192 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Ian Duffy
St. John Fisher · 2023-24
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Craig Simchuk
Manhattanville · 2008-09
0.125 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.