IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sam Williams Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-04-21 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Weyburn Red Wings SJHL 38 5 13 18 0.474 0.1214 0.1252 0.3571 0.3684
2012-13 Weyburn Red Wings SJHL 32 13 16 29 0.906 0.2322 0.2292 0.6831 0.6743
2013-14 — SJHL 37 5 15 20 0.540 0.1385 0.1294 0.4074 0.3807
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC SR 24 4 6 10 0.417
2016-17 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC JR 22 1 3 4 0.182
2015-16 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC SO 23 1 5 6 0.261
2014-15 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC FR 26 3 2 5 0.192
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.19
2014-15 · St. Scholastica
+32.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#29114
Forward overall
#1001
Forward born in 1993
#542
in SJHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Hunter Luhmann
Endicott · 2017-18
0.421 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jason Butler
Plymouth State · 2003-04
0.368 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Lamirande
Wisconsin-Superior · 2005-06
0.381 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.