IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Connor Court Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-02-24 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Boston Jr. Bandits EHL 33 6 5 11 0.333 0.0715 0.0702 0.1632 0.1602
2014-15 Boston Jr. Bandits EHL 42 12 10 22 0.524 0.1124 0.1051 0.2565 0.2398
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 UMass Dartmouth D3 HockeyEast SR 26 5 5 10 0.385
2017-18 UMass Dartmouth D3 HockeyEast JR 26 3 3 6 0.231
2016-17 UMass Dartmouth D3 HockeyEast SO 20 3 1 4 0.200
2015-16 UMass Dartmouth D3 HockeyEast FR 17 2 4 6 0.353
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.35
2015-16 · UMass Dartmouth
+352.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#39240
Forward overall
#1623
Forward born in 1994
#1218
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Aidan Cavallini
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brett Dillon
Bryn Athyn · 2018-19
0.231 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Braden Lindstrom
St. Norbert · 2021-22
0.357 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Josh Haverstrom
UMass Boston · 2013-14
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.