IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Carlos Ross Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-02-15 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 New York Bobcats EHL 42 8 9 17 0.405 0.0935 0.0917 0.1981 0.1942
2014-15 New York Bobcats EHL 41 9 28 37 0.902 0.2085 0.1947 0.4415 0.4122
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Western New England D1 CNE SR 23 1 6 7 0.304
2018-19 Western New England D3 CNE SR 23 1 6 7 0.304
2017-18 Western New England D3 CNE JR 21 1 4 5 0.238
2016-17 Western New England D3 CNE SO 18 1 3 4 0.222
2015-16 Western New England D3 CNE FR 18 2 4 6 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2015-16 · Western New England
+153.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#22287
Forward overall
#867
Forward born in 1994
#521
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Thomas Williams
Hamilton · 2009-10
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Saler
St. Scholastica · 2004-05
0.518 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Minerva
Neumann · 2016-17
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.