IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kendall Bolen-Porter Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-10-18 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Helena Bighorns NA3HL 45 15 33 48 1.067 0.1285 0.1219 0.3370 0.3198
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Finlandia D3 — SR 27 5 2 7 0.259
2017-18 Finlandia D3 — JR 25 2 3 5 0.200
2016-17 Finlandia D3 — SO 21 4 2 6 0.286
2015-16 Finlandia D3 — FR 22 1 3 4 0.182
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.18
2015-16 · Finlandia
+74.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#31774
Forward overall
#1316
Forward born in 1994
#648
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Doucet
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Nick DeCenzo
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Army (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Austin Ziakas
Saint Mary's · 2014-15
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Trevor Turner
New England College · 2005-06
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Brett Zeggil
Castleton · 2008-09
0.316 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.