IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kendall Bolen-Porter Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-10-18 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Helena Bighorns NA3HL 45 15 33 48 1.067 0.1359 0.1290 0.3374 0.3202
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Finlandia D1 — SR 27 5 2 7 0.259
2018-19 Finlandia D3 — SR 27 5 2 7 0.259
2017-18 Finlandia D3 — JR 25 2 3 5 0.200
2016-17 Finlandia D3 — SO 21 4 2 6 0.286
2015-16 Finlandia D3 — FR 22 1 3 4 0.182
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.18
2015-16 · Finlandia
+64.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#21846
Forward overall
#838
Forward born in 1994
#505
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Daniel Golba
SUNY Morrisville · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Trevor John
Tufts · 2008-09
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
David Becker
Bethel · 2014-15
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.