IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cam Cundy Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1994-04-15 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Connecticut RoughRiders EHL 37 2 5 7 0.189 0.0666 0.0658 0.0928 0.0917
2014-15 Connecticut RoughRiders EHL 42 5 23 28 0.667 0.2346 0.2209 0.3269 0.3078
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Plymouth State D1 — SR 28 1 6 7 0.250
2018-19 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast SR 28 1 6 7 0.250
2017-18 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast JR 18 1 5 6 0.333
2016-17 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast SO 15 1 5 6 0.400
2015-16 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast FR 11 0 2 2 0.182
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.18
2015-16 · Plymouth State
+21.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#9207
Defenseman overall
#1314
Defenseman born in 1994
#1205
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Dylan Shane
Skidmore · 2024-25
0.556 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Devon Schell
Wilkes · 2017-18
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Travis Brown
Saint John's · 2016-17
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.