IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyler Penner Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-10-12 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Steinbach Pistons MJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2013-14 Steinbach Pistons MJHL 59 21 11 32 0.542 0.1044 0.1100 0.3420 0.3605
2014-15 Steinbach Pistons MJHL 60 35 31 66 1.100 0.2118 0.2123 0.6937 0.6952
2015-16 Steinbach Pistons MJHL 48 23 35 58 1.208 0.2326 0.2209 0.7620 0.7236
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Colgate D1 ECAC SR 34 5 5 10 0.294
2018-19 Colgate D1 ECAC JR 36 4 3 7 0.194
2017-18 Colgate D1 ECAC SO 30 1 4 5 0.167
2016-17 Colgate D1 ECAC FR 31 2 1 3 0.097
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.10
2016-17 · Colgate
-48.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#18255
Forward overall
#694
Forward born in 1995
#131
in MJHL

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jason Yuel
Curry · 2006-07
1.769 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
R.G. Flath
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2004-05
1.240 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Jared Wynia
Fredonia · 2010-11
0.789 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.