IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

T.J. Fox Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1984-06-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 Syracuse Jr. Crunch OJHL 47 12 13 25 0.532 0.1598 0.1732 0.3641 0.3946
2002-03 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 32 3 3 6 0.188 0.1153 0.1176 0.5524 0.5636
2003-04 Chicago Steel USHL 56 11 16 27 0.482 0.2963 0.2867 1.4204 1.3742
2004-05 Chicago Steel USHL 60 21 29 50 0.833 0.5122 0.4698 2.4551 2.2517
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2006-07 Union D1 ECAC SO 36 13 24 37 1.028
2005-06 Union D1 ECAC FR 30 8 12 20 0.667
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.34
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.67
2005-06 · Union
+96.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#11456
Forward overall
#338
Forward born in 1984

D1 Comparables

Michael Huntebrinker
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.51 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Wahlin
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.33 PPG
→ UMass (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eric Scheid
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.94 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.52 Average
NCAAe PPG
Todd Skirving
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Shane Sooth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.52 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Lucas Signoretti
Buffalo State · 2024-25
1.120 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Woodward
SUNY Oswego · 2002-03
1.226 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Cole Hepler
Lebanon Valley · 2015-16
1.280 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.