IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Zach Pease Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-09-13 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Blind River Beavers NOJHL 40 7 16 23 0.575 0.0960 0.1001 0.2394 0.2497
2013-14 Kirkland Lake Gold Miners NOJHL 38 6 8 14 0.368 0.0615 0.0612 0.1534 0.1527
2014-15 Kirkland Lake Gold Miners NOJHL 34 15 19 34 1.000 0.1670 0.1566 0.4163 0.3904
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Canton D1 SUNYAC SR 25 2 7 9 0.360
2018-19 Canton D3 SUNYAC SR 25 2 7 9 0.360
2017-18 Canton D3 SUNYAC JR 24 3 8 11 0.458
2016-17 Canton D3 SUNYAC SO 22 0 2 2 0.091
2015-16 Fredonia D3 SUNYAC FR 2 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#33884
Forward overall
#1320
Forward born in 1994
#473
in NOJHL

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Dondre Watson
Marian · 2016-17
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Colby Seitz
SUNY Cortland · 2021-22
0.957 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Dan Moore
Post · 2016-17
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.