IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Zach Pease Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-09-13 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Blind River Beavers NOJHL 40 7 16 23 0.575 0.0969 0.1011 0.2389 0.2492
2013-14 Kirkland Lake Gold Miners NOJHL 38 6 8 14 0.368 0.0621 0.0618 0.1531 0.1524
2014-15 Kirkland Lake Gold Miners NOJHL 34 15 19 34 1.000 0.1686 0.1581 0.4155 0.3896
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Canton D3 — SR 25 2 7 9 0.360
2017-18 Canton D3 — JR 24 3 8 11 0.458
2016-17 Canton D3 — SO 22 0 2 2 0.091
2015-16 Fredonia D3 — FR 2 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#33866
Forward overall
#1400
Forward born in 1994
#441
in NOJHL

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Doucet
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jayson Angus
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cody Marooney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Colby Seitz
SUNY Cortland · 2021-22
0.957 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyle Haines
SUNY Cortland · 2007-08
0.818 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Martin Gruse
Saint Mary's · 2012-13
0.680 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.