IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Crosby Steen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-05-17 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Breezy Point North Stars NA3HL 35 5 5 10 0.286 0.0359 0.0365 0.0902 0.0916
2013-14 Breezy Point North Stars NA3HL 42 13 15 28 0.667 0.0837 0.0818 0.2105 0.2056
2014-15 Breezy Point North Stars NA3HL 41 8 10 18 0.439 0.0551 0.0511 0.1386 0.1286
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Bethel D3 MIAC — 14 0 1 1 0.071
2015-16 Bethel D3 MIAC — 10 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#44842
Forward overall
#1813
Forward born in 1994
#2557
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Joshua Swan
Stevenson · 2024-25
0.217 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Chase Mickelson
St. Norbert · 2017-18
0.300 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Dylan Roebuck
Castleton · 2021-22
0.273 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.