← New Search ↗ Social Card

Chase Mickelson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1997-05-16 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Springfield Jr. Blues NAHL 56 5 15 20 0.357 0.1269 0.1252 0.3767 0.3718
2017-18 Springfield Jr. Blues NAHL 47 4 16 20 0.425 0.1512 0.1417 0.4488 0.4207
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SR 23 1 7 8 0.348
2020-21 St. Norbert D3 NCHA JR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 St. Norbert D1 NCHA SO 26 1 6 7 0.269
2019-20 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SO 26 1 6 7 0.269
2018-19 St. Norbert D1 NCHA FR 30 2 7 9 0.300
2018-19 St. Norbert D3 NCHA FR 30 2 7 9 0.300
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.30
2018-19 · St. Norbert
+135.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
52%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10015
Defenseman overall
#1677
Defenseman born in 1997
#3499
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Marian · 2013-14
0.518 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2015-16
0.846 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.