IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Chase Brakel Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-12-01 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Portage Terriers MJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2015-16 Portage Terriers MJHL 60 27 23 50 0.833 0.1604 0.1775 0.5255 0.5815
2016-17 Portage Terriers MJHL 58 34 46 80 1.379 0.2655 0.2808 0.8698 0.9200
2017-18 Portage Terriers MJHL 49 26 32 58 1.184 0.2279 0.2300 0.7464 0.7532
2018-19 Portage Terriers MJHL 21 9 11 20 0.952 0.1833 0.1749 0.6006 0.5732
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Cornell D1 ECAC FR 6 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

45%
NCAA D1
20%
NCAA D2/D3
35%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15626
Forward overall
#721
Forward born in 1998
#95
in MJHL

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ben Aucoin
Southern Maine · 2024-25
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Taylor Pryce
Buffalo State · 2012-13
0.875 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Joseph Harguindeguy
Concordia · 2021-22
0.846 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.